Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Losing a Child - the week from hell



Four weeks ago was one of the very best days of my life. In the early morning hours my wife zoomed down the stairs to the couch where I had passed out on the night before, with something in her hand. I knew what it was right away and I knew what it meant. After over a year of trying, she was carrying a positive pregnancy test (as well as a "I'm pregnant!" look on her face). We embraced in complete joy. As I held her I looked to heaven and said thank you to my God and Father above for making me a father too. In morning prayer I sang songs and read psalms, culminating in Psalm 113, which begins with "Hallelujah" and ends with "He gives the barren woman a home, making her the joyous mother of children. Hallelujah!". We were ecstatic like never before. Two blood tests that week confirmed what we already knew: our long wait was over. Only of course to be supplanted by a new wait. Wait to tell family, wait to see if it's a boy or a girl, wait eight more months for a little cookie to come out the oven. It was hard to conceal our joy.
Image result for pregnancy test
Many months before I had a dream where I was a dad. I had a son. A wee little baby boy who was full of laughter. All I remember from the dream was looking down on my boy on a changing table, adorned in a striped onesie, and we were having a father-son moment. I was tickling and laughing and he was giggling and kicking. It was the best dream I ever had. I remembered waking up, ready to be a father. It felt so right it felt like a sign from God. I knew that if being a dad could have that kind of feeling there was nothing in the world I wanted more. So when I woke up four weeks ago to my wife running at me, I was waking up to my dream. It was one of the very best days of my life.

One week ago was one of the very worst days of my life. We had just gotten home from Christmas with my in-laws. It was a great holiday, we had shared the news with them that we were pregnant. My sister-in-law, also expecting had found out the day before they were having a girl. We were going in for our ultrasound, with the question of whether it would be one child or multiples (because the doctors had told us we had an increased chance of multiples). We were seven weeks along. That morning we were in good spirits and sharing all our hopes and excitement. When the ultrasound started, my heart began to sink.

"We're not seeing what we should," the doctor said. Nothing more at first. I didn't know what it meant, but I was afraid of what it meant. On Sunday and Monday nights each I had dreams that we lost the child. And a fear had been growing in my heart. Now it was not fear, it was grief. The minute the ultrasound tech/nurse/doctor (I'm not sure what the title is) stopped and said quietly to my wife "I'm so sorry" I knew. We had lost our baby.

In the conversations, blood tests, and another ultrasound that followed this last week we got more details, but the outcome is always the same. We lost our child. All those hopes, joys, and smiles. I went from waking up to dreams to waking up to nightmares. And I learned just how much those who have never gone through it will never understand. You know it's bad, but you don't realize how bad. And it breaks my heart to think of all the people I know who have lost their babies, and have experienced this hell, and especially those who went through it more than once.

What follows are some reflections on the experience this last week. If nothing else, so that those who face such hells themselves might know something of someone else's experience, to at least not feel so alone in this, which you can, I know because I felt very alone that day. Like my wife and I stood grieving on an island.

In the language of stages of grief, I've been depressed, angry, and sad. Not in that order, not in any order. Just depressed some times, angry others, sad most. But none of those words really do justice to what I've been. The tears I felt stream down my face in the doctor's office were but cracks in a dam that burst not long later. And I wailed this last week - several times - like I've never wailed before. I wasn't sad, I was broken. And broken without a way to be whole. My anger surprised me, and it has not been particularly strong, as genuine anger is something I have worked years to suppress (since those who may have known me as a child may know the holy terror I could become). But it nonetheless has been there too. I noticed it yesterday at the store. I was walking towards a section and all of the sudden realized I had been cutting through the baby section, and that triggered the anger. For weeks that section was one I secretly stopped by, peaked in on, smiled over. So when I walked through there only reminded of my grief and loss, I was angry. Not at anyone in particular, just angry.

Though we were grieving differently, my wife and I felt the need to spend an inordinate amount of time together. Being together, and being occupied with entertainment became our coping in the days to follow. We went to movies, rented movies, watched movies we owned. We sat on opposite ends of the couch - me watching something with headphones on, her listening to an audiobook - just needing to be distracted and yet be together so that in those moments the grief snuck in we could hold each other.

We decided to name our baby. It was important to validate and express that this was a real loss, it was our child. I have felt defensive against the claim that I didn't lose a "child" (even though no one has made it). I loath the term miscarriage, almost as much as fetus. Both to me sound like ways of downplaying what we are actually talking about. I wanted to give the baby one of the boy names we had come up with (boy, since in my dream was a boy I "knew"this baby would be one). My wife was reluctant. I wanted to use the name to indicate it was not wasted, because my baby was not wasted. My child was real, and had already given us perhaps the happiest month of our lives without even being born yet. In the end we decided to go with a symbolic name. Something we felt honored and spoke to what we felt we lost. A name worthy of such a blessing. So we named him Isaac, baby Isaac. Isaac was a long awaited child of Abraham and Sarah, promised long before he was conceived (as Isaac was to me). Abraham and Sarah struggled with doubts along the way (as did we), even laughing at God. But Isaac finally came. God also then presented Abraham and Sarah with the greatest test they ever faced, being asked to sacrifice Isaac. Now in that story God spared Isaac. But not in ours. Yet we too felt tested in a way we never have, and we felt in some manner we were being asked - forced - to offer our child back to God. Not to have to kill him as that choice was not ours, but to have to kill everything he meant to us. It was equally lost. And in fact, only Abraham was asked, we more like Sarah were subjected to the test without knowledge or will of its undertaking. Phyllis Trible gave a lecture at Valpo once on Genesis 22 which she called "The Sacrifice of Sarah", and it was from that perspective, of waiting, finding blessing, and it being taken away without voice that made Isaac such a fitting name for us.

My Christmas spirit was totally sapped away. The upcoming Gospel reading for that Sunday was the slaughtering of the innocents of Bethlehem from Matthew 2. And believe me, it is not easy when you are so stuck in grief of losing a child to be expected to preach on Herod slaying children. I really hated Herod for that. He made mothers and fathers experience what we were going through. There's too many Herods in the world today. I did have other options. Epiphany was the upcoming Friday, I could have merely gone with that Gospel story. That Sunday also happened to be the festival of the naming of Jesus. And I could have just gone off lectionary. But that wasn't my style. And the truth is, for how hard it was to have to preach on Matthew's telling of children dying, I was unable to divert my attention from it. My mind had been on really nothing but losing a child all week. So I dared to do so, to say something of what it was for Rachel to weep for her children and refuse to be consoled because they are no more. I preached what was probably the hardest sermon of my life. Not hardest to write, but hardest to speak, because I was as much in the pew that week as I was in the pulpit, and I was as much in need as I was in sharing towards others' spiritual needs. But I don't know if I could have really preached on anything else. Thankfully the text lended itself to the occasion, and therefore allowed me to do more than just talk my own thoughts, but to illustrate and engage God's own action in Jesus Christ, to share promise even when promise refuses to comfort. Because it did. Scripture was a mild comfort, and a short lived one this last week. But not because it does nothing or offers nothing. Rather I too refused to be comforted. For some things are too great a trespass to not be so grieved.

My faith in this time has been greatly blessed by being a pastor, because I have walked with people in grief. I've known something of its stages and character, even if from afar as opposed to what it is to be in it. I still know healthy habits, I still can identify much of the stages of grief. And I know and teach that being faithful is not the same as being all put together, always happy, always feeling blessed, or always polite and tame in my prayers. Thanks to things like the Psalms and professors like Dr. Nysse who at seminary pushed for the value of raw lament and expression in dark places without a token answer or breath of air, these influences let me be very open in my own grief with God. I have found, if you will, three H's that really put well what has been important for me in my faith with God in this time: honesty, humility, and hope.

Honesty: I was honestly hurt, and lost, and despairing. I had to share it. I was honestly doubting, not so much the foundations of my belief but you might say the goodness of it. The hard truth is that contrary to what many nonbelievers may think, losses like this actually fit well into the Christian world view. I wasn't playing some theodicy in my head. Things did not seem incompatible, they simply seemed dark and despairing. And there still were the questions of Why? Why not do something? Do something now! There was still cries of loss and a begging to be remembered in the light of his countenance again. There was still a begging to not let me lose my faith in it all, for although I challenged or disbelieved nothing, I was broken, and felt too broken to hold on so that I just needed to be held by the Spirit. Cries for answers, cries for help, cries for healing, cries of how I really felt about it all and God within it. I don't think I bared my soul anywhere quite like in prayer.

Humility: This sounds unnecessary, and at times it was not there. But I think overall I really needed it to maintain my faith. I just listened to a video of an atheist who said if he died, came upon the pearly gates and realized God was real he would chew him out. And when the interviewer commented he might not be let in he said he didn't want in. Humility may be at moments the only thing that separated me from that man. In my anger, in my grief, in my self-centered world (and believe me, this grief closes the world around you fast), in even my idolatry of Isaac, I at times stood toe-to-toe with God, only in the midst to back down, to bow my head, to say with a broken heart "into your hands I commit myself: my body, my soul, all that is mine." At various points within my honesty, I still realized I was a man and God may question me like a man (a la Jo)b. I know there is more that I don't know, I know that before God I approach by grace not by entitlement, I know that I am the clay and not the potter. And I am thankful for it, to those who see subservience, or weakness, or folly within this, just know that I see grace, because humble men (and women) are the ones who rely. Humility did not let sin take such control of my honesty that it could build the great lie that there is no God. Humility let me surrender my judgment, which sounds defeatist, but is actually an important victory in my grief. Surrendering my judgment on the matter has let me accept something of God that is actually quite good: it has let God be God. God is the judge, but then God is also the benevolent judge, that is, the heavenly Father, the incarnate Savior, the sighing Spirit. Not taking from God the judgment has strangely kept a wider faith intact, a faith that ultimately let's me keep being honest.

Hope: I have needed hope and Gospel. It has not "moved" me, it has not "fixed" things, it has not taken away my sorrow over Isaac, but it has promised something I can hope in. That as Isaac shared in all things with his mother, baby Isaac might share then in the faith and grace and baptismal hope that she herself lives in. That if God knew Jeremiah before he was in the womb, and from there the baptist could leap for joy at the approaching of an expectant Mary, from there my child too could have been touched by God. Before Isaac had ears to hear or a heart to "give to Jesus", I believe Jesus really gave something to Isaac. And one day, the child I never held or beheld, I will find is in some way held and holden to God. Jesus has always been able to do more and go further than I with every person I have ever known, so I will hope in him one more time. I have hope for myself too. I thought of Psalm 51 asking God to "restore to me the joy of your salvation, and sustain me with a willing spirit." I have hope he will.

I put it that way, because right now I don't have joy - in church or elsewhere. It is returning. But in those first days I scarcely laughed or smiled (hardly my default mode, as those who know me can attest). My wife and I had a wonderful moment on Monday, where we held each other down for the dogs to kiss. We were laughing and smiling and fooling around, and I realized after I had not had a moment like that since I first heard the news. I am joking more with people and more able to be by others, which for a while I was not. And I am moving more towards this joy in faith too. Last week, one day I was at church trying to do some work and I went to pray and pray and pray with open tears. And finally in desperation I was calling out to God for something, to tell me something, and I noticed a pew bible sitting next to me. Desperate I opened it in search of a word and on the first page I was hooked. The bible was bookmarked in Job, and I found myself reading Job's laments, his feelings. Things like "Truly the thing that I fear comes upon me, and what I dread befalls me. I am not at ease, nor am I quiet; I have no rest; but trouble comes." That was where I was. And reading it, finding momentary comfort even in sections of the words of his friends (such as "How happy is the one whom God reproves; therefore do not despise the discipline of the Almighty. For he wounds, but he binds up; he strikes, but his hands heal"), but also Job's refusal to settle for their words. I was at home. And by the time I was done reading I was oddly peaceful. Not comforted, yet peaceful. It was therapeutic to my grief as a person of faith to read those words and find something that expressed my loss of Isaac. In fact, my first you might say "God reflection" within all of this was in the car from the doctor's paraphrasing slightly Job's words "The Lord gave, and now he's taken away." Perhaps when we are in our dark places, when we are feeling lost, when we are hurt, it isn't the comforting passages that lead us back, but the crappy ones. The laments we normally don't get, don't read, or don't like. But that is why they are so powerful, because when I lost Isaac, I didn't get or like much of anything going on.

In the realm of unexpected comforts (or at least being drawn to unexpected places), I was drawn this morning in prayer to the famous Wesley hymn "O for a Thousand Tongues to Sing". I didn't know why, I didn't want to sing it at first. The song begins with this call to sing the Redeemer's praise, something I was struggling with doing. But it was the following verses that drew me in. I knew I was struggling with praise and joy, and verse two reads quite appropriately, "My gracious Master and my God, assist me to proclaim", it was a verse I played and prayed over and over, and with more and more gusto in the music, passionately praying through a hymn of praise for help praising. But there were also helpful words in verse three, "The name of Jesus charms our fears and bids our sorrows cease" and verse four "He speaks, and list'ning to his voice, new life the dead receive; the mournful, broken hearts rejoice," all words that spoke very deeply to me. If you have any doubt that you cannot preach to yourself, just be in grief. But the words of others, like Wesley there, like Job's, or in a myriad of other places, like in a commentary I read on the Isaiah reading for last Sunday which said, "We are comforted in knowing that the Lord shares our distress and pain. He is not distant, detached, or remote from any of his people. In all our afflictions, God himself is afflicted." For all the random places that have reminded me of Isaac, from the little onesie on a dresser, to the children's section in a store, to the mention of a baby on tv, to looking at a baseball and lamenting I will never play catch with Isaac, for all those reminders, God has been placing reminders too. Counter-reminders. Comforters. And though the comfort fades fast, or offers little actual comfort, they all hold on to me. They all also remind me of the Father above and Christ below. That gives me some form of hope, that God has not given up on comforting me even when I am not comforted.

If there has been a turning point for me, it has been Sunday. On Sunday, teary-eyed I told my church what happened, and as I mentioned preached on something of what I went through. I knew I had to tell them, if nothing else so that they understood why I was not myself, and seemed weary and not cheerful, why my energy was low and why at any given moment I could tear up. And if I didn't there would be the endless stream of well-intended "How was your Christmas?" like any normal, conversation would expect. And we would have to think of how to answer. For the practicality of it all I felt I had to tell them. But really it was for the support. I decided very early, saying that Wednesday as we made the long drive home from the clinic that I needed my people. I needed the church. And as I told them with teary eyes, they listened with teary eyes of their own. As they left the sanctuary that day they, like at a funeral, each offered condolences, gave me a hug, shed tears with me. In a week that had been so very alone, finally we didn't feel alone. If ever there was a place where God reaches out and reminds us, there it was.

What was also apparent from that moment was how many people too shared this pain themselves. How many, either themselves or their families suffered the same and worse yet sometimes suffered it over and over. I don't know if they all had the support they felt they needed or if they felt alone. I don't know what their grief is like, we each really do grieve differently. But I knew in that moment, that this is not something we should be silent about. It's why I write this. I write to process for myself, but also to speak up, to share with others. To again say how real the grief is because Isaac was real. I was reading a book for those in grief this week and it most succinctly described the uniqueness of loss by miscarriage, stillbirth, or early infant death, saying it isn't as simple as saying you can have another or at least you weren't too attached because I was attached and I wanted to have this baby! I wanted Isaac. And others may not know how many times in a month you can cup your wife's stomach and celebrate that you are having a baby. They may not know how often I said goodnight to Isaac even though (as my wife regularly reminded me) he didn't have ears yet. Others will never realize how much of our future we began to plan and alter for Isaac. I was very attached. And should I ever father another child, that child will be a blessing in her own right not a replacement for the blessing Isaac was. I'm fortunate no one said anything quite as ridiculous to me. But I'm still afraid they will. I'm still certain no one understands! That's why it feels so lonely. As much as Isaac's world was only his mother's womb, so our world felt small in a way, because one of the greatest parts of it was confined to our family and a few friends with inside knowledge. That's why I felt the need for the world to know my grief, that if nothing they may know Isaac through it. When I was a boy, I would acolyte for funerals, even of people I never knew. But you learned something of people at funerals. I liked funerals for that reason. That Sunday, in the love and care my people showed me, they let me open Isaac's world a little bit more. And that meant the world to me. Perhaps no one said anything bad because of that, maybe because they all know that if scripture was not comforting me those stagnate platitudes would not do the trick. Maybe too many of them suffered at the hand of those platitudes themselves. Either way, I have grieved with fear that my child will be dismissed by the world, and my grief will be expected to move on. And even with all this evidence to the contrary, I still carry that phobia.

December was the best and worst month of my life. Isaac has been promised and given back to God. Faith has been on a roller coaster of God moments amid the vast dark void that dominates the ride. And fear remains even as people continually offer the support I desperately needed. I am finding more light each day, and with it, I'm able to smile and laugh, something I previously felt guilty doing. I still cry. I've only gone one day without tears. And small things still set me off in sorrow and depression at a drop of a hat. I was going to say "but," except I don't have a but at this time. Buts may make for better writing, but they don't always exist. Some things just hurt, and they aren't worth the "bright side" talk. And losing Isaac was one of them. There is no bright side right now. Even the talk of God and faith and God moments are less a bright side and more being able to find God in the dark abyss. "if I make my bed in Sheol, you are there...If I say surely the darkness shall cover me, and the light around me become night, even the darkness is not dark to you..." but it is to me.

Four weeks ago I woke up to a dream. A week ago I woke up to a nightmare. I don't know what there is to wake to next. Thanks for reading. Thanks to all who are patiently walking with me.

Thank you Isaac for the brief time we had. Daddy loves you, and he will always remember.

*note: I have followed this post up with later Reflections for any who wish to read them

Friday, December 23, 2016

Baseball Christmas Lists: 3 Teams - 3 Moves

Time for a little baseball talk.

I love the offseason because of all the possibility it brings. Teams that seems irrelevant one year burst on the scene and make big offseason noise. While teams like the Red Sox and White Sox have dominated headlines, here are 3 teams that with a couple of possibly realistic moves could drastically improve their team for the 2017 season:

New York Yankees
The Yanks really did what I wanted them to do most this offseason: which was resign Ardolis Chapman for < $100mm and not blow all their young talent on a trade. I was lukewarm at best on Matt Holliday (although he has potential to be a great pickup, and at one year isn't likely to really be a "bad move"). But now New York can focus on some smaller moves that can put them in a place to contend without being "all in" moves.

Image result for new york yankees
1. Sign Brett Anderson. I did think Rich Hill would have been a good move for New York. But I understand not wanting to commit that kind of money to such an aging/injury prone recent phenom. That is why I like them as a place for Brett Anderson. Anderson is still young enough (He'll be 29 on opening day) to maintain his upside. At one point he was a future ace for Oakland, and has at 3 different seasons posted sub-3.00 ERAs, and has a solid career ERA of 3.86 (105 ERA+)and an even better career FIP (3.70). He is just a season removed from a strong season of 180.1 innings of 3.69 baseball. His downsides are he had a horrible year last season in terms of longevity and performance and that is saying much on the longevity side since he is consistently injured. In fact he has only amassed >100IP 3 times in his career. His upside and injury risk make him like a riskier-lesser Rich Hill; not as sexy but also not as expensive. And New York has only 3 players who are really locks for their rotation (Sabathia, Tanaka, and Pineda) who all are no sure thing on the health front, meaning they should take the risk because even if Anderson is likely no good for a full season they could benefit greatly from having him for even half a season. Additionally, while they have some interesting rotation pieces, they could certainly offer him a real chance to start rather than other teams where signing on he would be more of a depth piece. And while other high-risk pitchers may offer more upside (ala Tyson Ross), Anderson will likely cost the team much less to take the risk.

2. Acquire Hernan Perez from MIL for Leonardo Molina OR Donny Sands. The Yankees have a lot of young guys who will be getting extended looks this year and could use some players who offer positional versatility. Perez (26 in March) is just that. This last year for the Brewers he played all IF and OF positions, proving to be a true utility player. And while he hardly is an astute defender at any position, it is that flexibility that will make him valuable to New York who may have to send some guys down to get more cuts in the minors at times. Not only is Perez a cheap, young, controllable guy they can plug in wherever they need him, he also this last year started to show himself to be a solid offensive piece as well. In 123 games for MIL in 2016 he hit 13 homers and stole 34 bases. The main weakness in his game is he doesn't walk much, but he at least hits for solid average (in over 200 games for Milwaukee he hit just over .270). All in all he is a very valuable bench piece to plug in for injuries/off days or for things like late game pinch running. On the other side of the trade, Molina and Sands were both ranked at the back end of MLB.com's midseason top 30 organizational prospect ranking with Molina coming in as New York's 28th best prospect and Sands ranked at 26. Molina however has probably greater upside and in fact has a 5-tool ceiling, but he is way behind in New York's depth chart and still years away (2019 ETA per the site) making him expendable. Sands also has a 2019 ETA, and was an 8th rounder drafted in 2015. He was a SS/P moved to 3B when drafted and then to C, where I imagine his intrigue for MIL would come in as their best C prospect (Nottingham) does not seem a sure thing to stick at the position. Both players are low enough that New York could afford to deal them but either one should be quality enough to garner Milwaukee's interest in a trade.


Related image
3. Sign Jorge De La Rosa. These moves seem so small scale for New York, but they make sense. The benefit of De La Rosa, a LHP who has spent quite some time now in the unfriendly pitching confines of COL is he can start or pitch relief. In fact, while most players of that tune are more likely seeking starting gigs, De La Rosa was clear he is willing to pitch relief. That means New York could sign him as a bit of a swing man, intending to use him in the pen, but able to switch him to the rotation in the likely event one of their starters is injured. He just makes sense as a depth option and is helpful by his openness to also pitching relief, which too many pitchers are grumpy about (ask Matt Garza if you don't believe me). And frankly, any guy who can survive Coors can compete in the AL East.

Houston Astros
Houston made some noise early in the offseason, adding Carlos Beltran, Brian McCann, Nori Aoki, and Charlie Morton. They are positioning themselves to be a tough team, combining this now young core of players with the necessary accompaniments.
Image result for houston astros
1. Acquire Drew Smyly from TB for Forrest Whitley OR David Paulino, Daz Cameron OR Teoscar Hernandez, and Brady Rogers OR Guadalupe Chavez and Mike Fiers. It's no secret that Houston wants to improve its rotation. I can understand why as their current #1-3 starters all have great potential but have varying question marks. They were long said by many to be a good match for the White Sox's remaining gem Jose Quintana, but the cost is likely too much. Houston spent years in obscurity to build up this system and that kind of deal is just not worth it, not especially when they have a solid enough rotation that they don't need an ace or #2 pitcher. Still, it would help. This deal aims at one of the ones who may be available and attainable at a non-system gutting price. The price will be high still, because of how poor the free agent market was for starters, but Smyly had a down year and durability concerns enough that his price should still be attainable. Whitley or Paulino, both top 100 prospects on mlb.com's midseason report (69 and 70 respectfully) would be the headliner. Cameron or Hernandez would give a second top 10 team prospect and provide Tampa with an OF, an area they could improve upon organizationally, and the last prospect choice (between Rogers who has less upside but more MLB ready and Chavez who has a little more upside but is further away) is the cost of a pitcher in this market I think. Even with two top 10 prospects from a deep organization, 1 being a top 100 prospect, it will still likely take one more to get things done. Fiers also is a nice pickup for Tampa, giving them an immediate (albeit lesser) replacement who has some upside of his own. Why do this? Because before last season Smyly looked like a budding ace having delivered seasons of 2.37, 3.24, and 3.11 ball. He also has a strong career k/9 rate of 8.7 and a 3.43 k/bb ratio. He could step into the #2 or #3 spot of Houston's rotation and greatly improve their overall pitching outlook (if he can remain healthy of course).

Image result for tyson ross2. Sign Tyson Ross. The second move to strengthen the rotation is Ross. Near about any team in baseball could be in on Ross right now, and if healthy he could likely step into any rotation. How healthy he will be is the question, and how much he will cost is the issue. Ross is rumored to be seeking 9-10mm to pitch for someone. Houston could go one of several routes I think: offer the money, or offer less guaranteed money (say 6mm) with either a lot of incentives to boost it well beyond that total (like to 12-13mm) or include 1-2mm in incentives AND a player option at a similar rate, offering Ross the choice to have another season of guaranteed money or to reenter the market if he fares well in 2017. Either way, Ross's success in SD is just too strong to ignore, and would make him a great addition to the rotation, even if only for part of the season. And pitching for a winner should hold some appeal in its own right. This would also prevent division rival teams like, Los Angeles, Seattle and Texas, all of whom would also have real reasons to add Ross.

3.Sign Brandon Moss. Houston has some uncertainty at LF and 1B, where guys like Reed, Aoki, and Gattis may be taking the bulk of the time. Additionally, Beltran while he has been so good for so long, is getting up there quickly in age. Depth at these positions, quality depth, would be wise. Moss adds another guy into that mix of 1B/LF/DH types. He has shown, including last year, some serious pop in his bat yet with the glut of similar types of rocky defense, big power hitters in this market he isn't likely to cost the team too much. Perhaps a 2 year deal in the $10-$16mm range. That's a modest commitment for a guy who hit 19 or more homers in each of the last 5 seasons, include 28 last year (his 3rd time hitting 25 or more) in only 128 games.

Colorado Rockies
What the Rockies really need is to build a completely indoor stadium like the Metrodome, where they can control air pressure more and make the place playable for pitchers. Or simply move to another city. But since neither of those seem likely to happen anytime soon, how about we settle for a couple deals that could put this fringe contender in a place to be a real contender if some of their young players continue to improve.
Image result for colorado rockies


1. Trade Carlos Gonzalez to BAL for Darrin O'Day and PTBNL. The O's are still looking for an OF upgrade, the Rockies have a surplus of OF. While Blackmon is the more appealing option, he seems at this point less likely to be dealt as the teams that needed him the most and would pay well for him prospect wise seem to have all moved on, thus I think Car-Go is the more likely trade candidate. According to MLBtraderumors, Baltimore balked at a Jay Bruce for Brad Brach swap. I think a Cargo-for-Brach would be a good deal, but I'm not sure BAL would do that with all the salary they would be taking on, and they would be taking on a lot with Car-Go's 20mm 2017 salary. But being a one-year rental might be nice for BAL as they have a small window of contention anyways so they may prefer short term commitments. Coming back in the deal, COL adds to their bullpen. A Colorado team needs more than a good starter, it needs a good bullpen. Therefore O'Day, who has a career 2.41 ERA, and has through his career stranded 75% of his inherited runners would be a good addition. And while pricey, he is controllable for 3 more seasons. It's hard to gauge how the 1-for-1 element lines up, but I think it would be reasonable to expect Baltimore to contribute a minor leaguer in this deal, just who though is hard to determine and will be left as a player to be named later. Ultimately the deal is about adding a quality reliever while opening up a spot in the crowded OF and adding financial relief so that they can...

Image result for matt wieters2. Sign Matt Wieters. I really liked COL as a site for C Jason Castro. Castro was a great receiver, but a light hitting catcher. He seemed perfect for Colorado since the confines would perhaps attract him so he could boost his offense hitting there while bringing him in would improve pitching theoretically since he was a good game caller and pitch framer. If Colorado cannot use free agency to bring in good pitchers, they should try using it to bring in catchers who can improve their current pitchers. While he is not as good defensively, Wieters does bring defensive upside with him along with offensive upside that would play well in Colorado. He could shore up what has long been a position of weakness for the Rockies. And the available funds from trading Gonzalez should make adding him possible. It will also allow Desmond to move to OF so the team can...

3. Sign one of Chris Carter, Mark Trumbo, Mike Napoli. The Trumbotron would be the best here I think. His power would play well, he could probably handle 1B halfway decently, and the team already surrendered its first-rounder when it signed Desmond so he will only cost a 2nd round draft pick. But I'm not sure they will have the budget space for him post-Wieters signing. If not, Napoli is a winner, a fan-favorite, a capable defender, and still has some power as he displayed last year for AL Champion Cleveland. But Carter may be cheaper, and still brings walks and way more power to the game as he led the NL in homers last year at 41. Any one of them will add pop, the question is really the price difference as to which one makes the most sense for Colorado. If I had to pick only one, I'd go with Napoli as the better combo of defense and power and the desire to excite the fanbase while more likely being in their price range.

So that's my picks to improve New York's depth, Houston's rotation, and round Colorado out a bit. What are your thoughts?